Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

Educational Justice Resources

Links to reserch sources that explore the value of diversity and justice in educaton.

What is Linguistic Justice?

  Linguist Justice image                          Justice, Authenticity, and Identity

Some of us grew up with, and therefore teach, what is referred to as "proper English." However, standard, or "proper English" is in reality, simply white mainstream English grammar and usage. It is only standard or proper for people who grew up speaking it. We need to think about how students who are from backgrounds other than the white mainstream might feel when they hear the term "Proper English?"

Linguistic Justice acknowledges that ALL languages and language forms are beautiful and valuable. Teaching only "proper English" reinforces white power structures and systems.

Linguisitic Justice is a commitment to challenge the belief that there is only one correct way to speak and write and other languages or dialects are substandard.

Linguistic Justice calls on us to change our perspective and to view the way a person naturally communicates as an asset rather than something to be corrected.

Linguistic Justice exposes how, “traditional approaches to language education do not account for the emotional harm, internalized linguistic racism, or consequences these approaches have on Black students sense of self and identity” (Baker-Bell, 2020).

Linguistic Justice “raises awareness of the ways that hierarchies of oppression and exploitation are kinds of inhumane systems that restrict, limit, deny, distort, or destroy individuals’ or groups’ of people access to their full potential” (NYU Metropolitan Center for Research on Equity and the Transformation of Schools, 2022).

Linguistic Justice is a pledge to teach critical grammar which “encourages students to develop a critical awareness of the variety of choices available to them with  regard to micro-level issues in order to empower them and equip them to push against biases based on ‘written’ accents’” (Walkowitz, 2020).

Lingusitic Justice - Writing Center - Western Tech Learning Commons

keri bitmoji

 

Q.  In light of this new knowledge we asked, "Are our current writing practices helping or hurting students?"

A.  Requiring people to share their experiences or speak their truth, but if only do it the right way, actually silences them and ignores their identity. It's like saying the  real "you" isn't good enough uness "you" express yourself the right way -- or the white way.  -- Michael Reynolds (Western Tech student)

A.  When a person of color hands you an idea, an article, or a story, don't edit it it to sound like you. Do not whitewash our words to appeal to just one type of demographic. Make space for and amplify all of our voices. Let go of your gatekeeping keys and let us in. Don't erase my fellow BIPOC and don't erase me." - Yolie Contreras (writer)

Editing should help you realize and refine your voice, not erase it.

It seems clear that so long as we do not challenge the “linguistic status quo”--we cannot

claim to be trauma-informed in our Writing Center.

 

Learning commons logo

Practices and Commitments: Writing Center (Learning Commons)

In-Person (Individual) Feedback

  • We ask LOTS of questions–we often spend more time listening than talking

  • We study the assignment together–we help the student understand the instructor’s expectations 

  • We reflect on their writing together–we help the student determine how their work aligns to expectations

  • We avoid using judgment and pointing out “mistakes”

  • We work hard to avoid positioning  ourselves as “writing experts”--instead,  we view the student as the expert on their own writing

  • We operate from a mindset of humility and curiosity–we ask questions rather than telling students what they should or shouldn’t do

  • We offer observations rather than directives–we phrase feedback as an “invitation” to revise

  • We help students critically reflect on their writing and we empower them to make choices about their own writing

Written Feedback

  • Our ultimate goal is to empower students to strengthen and refine their writing skills—not just “fix” one assignment 

  • Help the student recognize the strengths of their writing--always try to insert multiple positive comments!—these positives can be on ANY aspect of the assignment 

  • Point out areas of concern in the student’s writing or areas where the writing could be strengthened 

  • Obviously, we want to help the student produce higher quality work—that the student is proud of—and that earns them a higher grade—but we want this higher grade to be a reflection of the student’s effort, growth, and choice 

  • Try to critique the writing rather than the writer  (i.e. “you seem to have lost focus in this paragraph” vs. “it is a little unclear how this paragraph supports your thesis--how could you make that connection stronger for your reader?”) 

  • As much as possible, avoid comments that come across as if we are the “experts” 

  • Avoid “I” and “you” statements that come across as too directive (“I think you should…” “I’d like to see you…” “You should…”) 

  • Keep comments more “reflective” and less “corrective” 

  • The best feedback leads the writer to an “awakening”—where THEY realize and implement changes based on this new perspective

  • Ideally, we help the student improve their writing skills and build confidence that they apply to this and all future assignments  

Classroom Teaching

  • Revise language on our  Powerpoints and Presentations to avoid use of  the words, “standard” “proper” “correct” etc.
  • Emphasize that APA, business writing, medical/scientific writing, etc. are STYLES–not Standards
  • Emphasize that these styles are not “better” “best” or “ideal”
  • Teach these styles as mere TOOLS—tools that students can then use as THEY see fit based on the rhetorical situation
  • Emphasize the students' purposeful application of the tools over the minutiae of punctuation, citations, etc.
  • Provide more opportunities for students to use OTHER styles and “tools”
  • Allow students to make CHOICES without punishment
  • Grammar and “white middle class English” (WMCE) are not inherently racist…just a set of rules…but when we “weaponize” our application of WMCE it becomes racist/discriminatory (Inoue, 2017)
  • Never assume that students know the rules (white privilege)

trust and empower image

Linguistic Justice Learning Resources: A Starting Point

Cover image: Lingustic Justice, Black Language, Literacy, Identity, and PedogogyBlack Language Syllabust Logo

Re-Verb podcast logo

Rhetoricity Podcast Logo

 


Western Technical College
Western Technical College Learning Commons
Student Success Center, Room 201
400 7th Street North
La Crosse, WI 54601
learningcommons@westerntc.edu
State Relay: 711
EEO Statement

Learn more about Western and the Learning Commons.
The Learning Commons provides library and academic support services on campus and online. The Learning Commons will set you up for success!

Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. For details and exceptions, see the Library Copyright Statement.
©2020, Western Technical College

If you are experiencing disability related accessibility issues with any information on this website, please email AccessServices@westerntc.edu or call 608-785-9524.